> > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 1:28 PM
> > To: Ville Syrjälä
> > Cc: Satish Kumar Nagireddy ; dri-
> > de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm: Add new DIRTY fb flags to pass interlaced
> > alternate fields
> >
> > On Mo
ddy ; dri-
> de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm: Add new DIRTY fb flags to pass interlaced
> alternate fields
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 03:02:16PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 02:46:21PM -0700, Satish Kumar Nagireddy wrote:
> >
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 03:02:16PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 02:46:21PM -0700, Satish Kumar Nagireddy wrote:
> > The requirement is to render interlaced alternate buffers. In case of
> > alternate, top field and bottom field are in two different buffers.
> >
> > The que
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 02:46:21PM -0700, Satish Kumar Nagireddy wrote:
> The requirement is to render interlaced alternate buffers. In case of
> alternate, top field and bottom field are in two different buffers.
>
> The question is, can we pass existing flags DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD
> and DRM
The requirement is to render interlaced alternate buffers. In case of
alternate, top field and bottom field are in two different buffers.
The question is, can we pass existing flags DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD
and DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD to DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETPLANE ioctl?
But in case if urrent fr
