On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 05:49:50PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 17:43 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 04:21:37PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 12.04.21 um 16:16 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
> > > > Hi, Christian,
> > > >
> > > >
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 17:43 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 04:21:37PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 12.04.21 um 16:16 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
> > > Hi, Christian,
> > >
> > > On 4/12/21 4:01 PM, Christian König wrote:
> > > > Hi Thomas,
> > > >
> > > > we
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 04:21:37PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>
>
> Am 12.04.21 um 16:16 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
> > Hi, Christian,
> >
> > On 4/12/21 4:01 PM, Christian König wrote:
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > >
> > > well in general a good idea, but I'm working on a different plan for
> > > a w
Am 12.04.21 um 16:40 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
On 4/12/21 4:21 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 12.04.21 um 16:16 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
Hi, Christian,
On 4/12/21 4:01 PM, Christian König wrote:
Hi Thomas,
well in general a good idea, but I'm working on a different plan
for a while now.
On 4/12/21 4:21 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 12.04.21 um 16:16 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
Hi, Christian,
On 4/12/21 4:01 PM, Christian König wrote:
Hi Thomas,
well in general a good idea, but I'm working on a different plan for
a while now.
My idea here is that instead of the BO the res
Am 12.04.21 um 16:16 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
Hi, Christian,
On 4/12/21 4:01 PM, Christian König wrote:
Hi Thomas,
well in general a good idea, but I'm working on a different plan for
a while now.
My idea here is that instead of the BO the resource object is kept on
a double linked lru
Hi, Christian,
On 4/12/21 4:01 PM, Christian König wrote:
Hi Thomas,
well in general a good idea, but I'm working on a different plan for a
while now.
My idea here is that instead of the BO the resource object is kept on
a double linked lru list.
The resource objects then have a pointer t
Hi Thomas,
well in general a good idea, but I'm working on a different plan for a
while now.
My idea here is that instead of the BO the resource object is kept on a
double linked lru list.
The resource objects then have a pointer to either the BO or a fence object.
When it is a fence objec
This RFC needs some decent testing on a driver with bos that share
reservation objects, and of course a check for whether I missed
something obvious.
The locking around delayed destroy is rather complex due to the fact
that we want to individualize dma_resv pointers before putting the object
on th
