Re: [RFC 1/3] clk: inherit display clocks enabled by bootloader

2017-07-18 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 07/17, Nayak, Rajendra wrote: > > > On 7/14/2017 4:13 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > >On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Rajendra Nayak > >wrote: > >>Hi Rob, > >> > >>On 07/11/2017 11:50 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > >> > >>>diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c > >>>index d5239

Re: [RFC 1/3] clk: inherit display clocks enabled by bootloader

2017-07-17 Thread Nayak, Rajendra
On 7/14/2017 4:13 PM, Rob Clark wrote: On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: Hi Rob, On 07/11/2017 11:50 PM, Rob Clark wrote: The goal here is to support inheriting a display setup by bootloader, although there may also be some non-display related use-cases. Rough idea is

Re: [RFC 1/3] clk: inherit display clocks enabled by bootloader

2017-07-14 Thread Rob Clark
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On 07/11/2017 11:50 PM, Rob Clark wrote: >> The goal here is to support inheriting a display setup by bootloader, >> although there may also be some non-display related use-cases. >> >> Rough idea is to add a flag for clks and p

Re: [RFC 1/3] clk: inherit display clocks enabled by bootloader

2017-07-13 Thread Rajendra Nayak
Hi Rob, On 07/11/2017 11:50 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > The goal here is to support inheriting a display setup by bootloader, > although there may also be some non-display related use-cases. > > Rough idea is to add a flag for clks and power domains that might > already be enabled when kernel starts,

[RFC 1/3] clk: inherit display clocks enabled by bootloader

2017-07-11 Thread Rob Clark
The goal here is to support inheriting a display setup by bootloader, although there may also be some non-display related use-cases. Rough idea is to add a flag for clks and power domains that might already be enabled when kernel starts, and make corresponding fixups to clk enable/prepare_count an