On 12/11/2014 02:43 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:58:37PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
>> I'd expect someone reading the change in the regulator API to have at
>> least some idea how this fits in with the rest of the API and how to use
>> it, and probably more importa
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:58:37PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> I'd expect someone reading the change in the regulator API to have at
> least some idea how this fits in with the rest of the API and how to use
> it, and probably more importantly I'd expect to be able to understand
> why this is DT onl
Hi Mark,
On 12/10/2014 05:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Regulators supports various methods of lookup.
>> The patch adds restrack support only to DT based regulators.
> Why, what does this mean and how might one use it? I've not looke
Regulators supports various methods of lookup.
The patch adds restrack support only to DT based regulators.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 77 ++
include/linux/regulator/consumer.h | 10 +
include/linux/restrack.h
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Regulators supports various methods of lookup.
> The patch adds restrack support only to DT based regulators.
Why, what does this mean and how might one use it? I've not looked at
the code since I don't know what it's supposed to ac