On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> I wasn't here at the beginnings of DRM so I might have gotten this wrong,
> however the existance of DRM_NAME suggested to me that the intention was to
> allow individual drivers to override it and get appropriate p
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
I wasn't here at the beginnings of DRM so I might have gotten this wrong,
however the existance of DRM_NAME suggested to me that the intention was to
allow individual drivers to override it and get appropriate prefixes in their
log messages.
I can't see that any driver is us