Hi Rob, Tomi,
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 07:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:25 -0500, Rob Clark wrote
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Semwal, Sumit wrote:
> Hi Rob, Tomi,
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 07:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Semwal, Sumit wrote:
> Hi Rob, Tomi,
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 07:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
wrot
Hi Rob, Tomi,
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 07:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:25 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 07:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:25 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> > I guess the fact is that DRM concepts do not really ma
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:25 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
> wrote:
> > I guess the fact is that DRM concepts do not really match the OMAP DSS
> > hardware, and we'll have to use whatever gives us least problems.
>
> Actually, I think it does map fairly
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 07:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:25 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>> >> wrote:
>>
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:25 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>> wrote:
>
>> > I guess the fact is that DRM concepts do not really match the OMAP DSS
>> > hardware, and we'll have to use whatever give
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 07:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:25 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>> >> wrote:
>> >
>>
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 07:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:25 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> > I guess the fact is that DRM concepts do not really match
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:25 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>
>> > I guess the fact is that DRM concepts do not really match the OMAP DSS
>> > hardware, and we'll have to use whatever gives us
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:25 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > I guess the fact is that DRM concepts do not really match the OMAP DSS
> > hardware, and we'll have to use whatever gives us least problems.
>
> Actually, I think it does map fairly we
Hi,
On Wednesday 01 August 2012 07:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 09:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>>> wrote:
>>
It's not really about being friendly. Omapdss tries
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 11:53 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> Ok.. this would help. I'll take a look. I do request that
> interfaces/panels don't set any mgr/timing related registers. I had
> to comment all this stuff out in my prototype. Really we want to set
> the timings separately on the crtc (mgr
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 11:53 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>
>> Ok.. this would help. I'll take a look. I do request that
>> interfaces/panels don't set any mgr/timing related registers. I had
>> to comment all this stuff out in my prototype.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 11:53 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>
>> Ok.. this would help. I'll take a look. I do request that
>> interfaces/panels don't set any mgr/timing related registers. I had
>> to comment all this stuff out in my prototype. R
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 09:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
> wrote:
> > It's not really about being friendly. Omapdss tries to do as little as
> > possible, while still supporting all its HW features. Shadow registers
> > are a bit tricky creating this
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Archit Taneja wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 01 August 2012 07:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>>> wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 09:45 -0500, Rob Clar
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Archit Taneja wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Wednesday 01 August 2012 07:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 09:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Tomi Valke
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 11:53 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> Ok.. this would help. I'll take a look. I do request that
> interfaces/panels don't set any mgr/timing related registers. I had
> to comment all this stuff out in my prototype. Really we want to set
> the timings separately on the crtc (mgr
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Archit Taneja wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 01 August 2012 07:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>>> wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 09:45 -0500, Rob Clar
Hi,
On Wednesday 01 August 2012 07:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 09:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
It's not really about being friendly. Omapdss tries to do as little a
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Archit Taneja wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Wednesday 01 August 2012 07:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 09:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Tomi Valke
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 09:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>> wrote:
>
>> > It's not really about being friendly. Omapdss tries to do as little as
>> > possible, while still supporting all its HW
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 09:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
>> wrote:
>
>> > It's not really about being friendly. Omapdss tries to do as little as
>> > possible, while still supporting all its HW
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 09:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > It's not really about being friendly. Omapdss tries to do as little as
> > possible, while still supporting all its HW features. Shadow registers
> > are a bit tricky creating this mes
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 20:07 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark
>
> I've been working for the better part of the week on solving some of
> the omapdss vs kms mismatches, which is one of the bigger remaining
> issues in the TODO before moving omapdrm out of staging.
>
> The biggest pla
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 20:07 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>>
>> I've been working for the better part of the week on solving some of
>> the omapdss vs kms mismatches, which is one of the bigger remaining
>> issues in t
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 20:07 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>>
>> I've been working for the better part of the week on solving some of
>> the omapdss vs kms mismatches, which is one of the bigger remaining
>> issues in th
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 20:07 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark
>
> I've been working for the better part of the week on solving some of
> the omapdss vs kms mismatches, which is one of the bigger remaining
> issues in the TODO before moving omapdrm out of staging.
>
> The biggest pla
From: Rob Clark
I've been working for the better part of the week on solving some of
the omapdss vs kms mismatches, which is one of the bigger remaining
issues in the TODO before moving omapdrm out of staging.
The biggest place that this shows up is in GO bit handling. Basically,
some of the sc
From: Rob Clark
I've been working for the better part of the week on solving some of
the omapdss vs kms mismatches, which is one of the bigger remaining
issues in the TODO before moving omapdrm out of staging.
The biggest place that this shows up is in GO bit handling. Basically,
some of the sc
32 matches
Mail list logo
