On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 10-06-17 19:14, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita wrote:
>> I applied this change and now gnome monitors tool identifies it as
>> another monitor, thanks Noralf! There are still some problems: when I
>> activate it, gnome complains "could not s
Den 11.06.2017 19.20, skrev Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 10-06-17 19:14, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita wrote:
I applied this change and now gnome monitors tool identifies it as
another monitor, thanks Noralf! There are still some proble
Hi,
On 11-06-17 19:20, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 10-06-17 19:14, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita wrote:
I applied this change and now gnome monitors tool identifies it as
another monitor, thanks Noralf! There are still some probl
Hi Devs!
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> I don't think that using cma for the gm12u320 is a good idea, it will
> typically be used as a secondary GPU output together with a real GPU
> extending the desktop by being a prime display output. So for the memory
> management stuf
Hi Devs!
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
>
> Den 09.06.2017 22.59, skrev Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
>>
>> Hi Devs!
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't think that using cma for the gm12u320 is a good idea, it will
>>> typically be us
Hi,
On 10-06-17 19:14, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita wrote:
Hi Devs!
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
Den 09.06.2017 22.59, skrev Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
Hi Devs!
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
I don't think that using cma for the gm12u32
Hi,
On 09-06-17 22:59, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita wrote:
Hi Devs!
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
I don't think that using cma for the gm12u320 is a good idea, it will
typically be used as a secondary GPU output together with a real GPU
extending the desktop by being a
Den 09.06.2017 22.59, skrev Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
Hi Devs!
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
I don't think that using cma for the gm12u320 is a good idea, it will
typically be used as a secondary GPU output together with a real GPU
extending the desktop by being a p
Hi,
On 07-06-17 23:14, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
Den 07.06.2017 22.19, skrev Noralf Trønnes:
Den 07.06.2017 21.50, skrev Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
Den 07.06.2017 20.46, skrev Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
Hi Noralf!
On Wed, Jun 7, 201
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
>
> Den 07.06.2017 20.46, skrev Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
>>
>> Hi Noralf!
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
>>>
>>> tinydrm is targeted at displays on slow busses where userspace tells
>>> the driver which part o
Hi Emil!
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 2 June 2017 at 17:39, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita
> wrote:
>> Hi Emil!
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> As Daniel mentioned in the earlier thread, factoring out things can be
>>> done as a follow
Hi Noralf!
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> tinydrm is targeted at displays on slow busses where userspace tells
> the driver which part of the framebuffer it has changed to minimize
> the transfer.
>
> The PL111 driver uses drm_simple_display_pipe and might be a better
> e
Den 07.06.2017 22.19, skrev Noralf Trønnes:
Den 07.06.2017 21.50, skrev Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Noralf Trønnes
wrote:
Den 07.06.2017 20.46, skrev Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
Hi Noralf!
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Noralf Trønnes
wrote:
tinydrm
Den 07.06.2017 21.50, skrev Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
Den 07.06.2017 20.46, skrev Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
Hi Noralf!
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
tinydrm is targeted at displays on slow busses where us
Den 07.06.2017 20.46, skrev Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
Hi Noralf!
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
tinydrm is targeted at displays on slow busses where userspace tells
the driver which part of the framebuffer it has changed to minimize
the transfer.
The PL111 driver u
Hi Marco,
Den 07.06.2017 17.35, skrev Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
Hi Emil!
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 2 June 2017 at 17:39, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita
wrote:
Hi Emil!
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
As Daniel mentioned in the earlier t
On 2 June 2017 at 17:39, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita
wrote:
> Hi Emil!
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> As Daniel mentioned in the earlier thread, factoring out things can be
>> done as a follow-up.
>> On the other hand, I _think_ that the blocker for this driver that
>
Hi Emil!
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> As Daniel mentioned in the earlier thread, factoring out things can be
> done as a follow-up.
> On the other hand, I _think_ that the blocker for this driver that
> it's not doing atomic mode setting.
>
I've been looking on other sma
Hi Marco,
Disclaimer: I'm mostly lurking around, barring the occasional patch so
please take my input with a grain of salt.
On 1 June 2017 at 23:46, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita
wrote:
> Hi Devs!
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This is a resend of a pat
Hi Devs!
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is a resend of a patch I send out a while back, rebased on top
> of 4.12-rc3. Back then the main comment was can you try to make this
> driver use the drm_simple_kms_helper stuff? Unfortunately I have
> not had time
Hi All,
This is a resend of a patch I send out a while back, rebased on top
of 4.12-rc3. Back then the main comment was can you try to make this
driver use the drm_simple_kms_helper stuff? Unfortunately I have
not had time yet to look into this.
Recently I've been contacted by Marco Diego Aurélio
21 matches
Mail list logo
