On 11/29/2012 08:20 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> On 11/28/2012 10:51 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
>>> I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
>>> it on the following example.
>>>
>>> Unigine Heaven needs about 385
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 10:51 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
>>
>> I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
>> it on the following example.
>>
>> Unigine Heaven needs about 385MB of space for static resources, that's
>> only
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:20:17PM +0100, Marek Ol??k wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
> > On 11/28/2012 10:51 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
> >>
> >> I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
> >> it on the following example.
> >>
> >> Un
On 11/29/2012 08:20 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/28/2012 10:51 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
it on the following example.
Unigine Heaven needs about 385MB of space for sta
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:20:17PM +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
> > On 11/28/2012 10:51 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> >>
> >> I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
> >> it on the following example.
> >>
> >> Un
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 10:51 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>
>> I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
>> it on the following example.
>>
>> Unigine Heaven needs about 385MB of space for static resources, that's
>> only 7
On 11/29/2012 10:28 AM, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Don, 2012-11-29 at 10:18 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>> On 11/28/2012 10:51 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
>>> I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
>>> it on the following example.
>>>
>>> Unigine Heaven needs about 385M
On Don, 2012-11-29 at 10:18 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 10:51 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
> > I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
> > it on the following example.
> >
> > Unigine Heaven needs about 385MB of space for static resources, that's
> > onl
On 11/28/2012 10:51 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
> I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
> it on the following example.
>
> Unigine Heaven needs about 385MB of space for static resources, that's
> only 75% of my 512MB card. Yet, TTM is not capable of getting all of
> that
On 11/29/2012 10:28 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Don, 2012-11-29 at 10:18 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/28/2012 10:51 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
it on the following example.
Unigine Heaven needs about 385MB of space for s
On Don, 2012-11-29 at 10:18 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 10:51 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
> > it on the following example.
> >
> > Unigine Heaven needs about 385MB of space for static resources, that's
> > onl
On 11/28/2012 10:51 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
it on the following example.
Unigine Heaven needs about 385MB of space for static resources, that's
only 75% of my 512MB card. Yet, TTM is not capable of getting all of
that into VRA
I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
it on the following example.
Unigine Heaven needs about 385MB of space for static resources, that's
only 75% of my 512MB card. Yet, TTM is not capable of getting all of
that into VRAM. If I allow GTT placements, I get 20 fps, w
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
> I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
> it on the following example.
>
> Unigine Heaven needs about 385MB of space for static resources, that's
> only 75% of my 512MB card. Yet, TTM is not capable of getting all
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
> it on the following example.
>
> Unigine Heaven needs about 385MB of space for static resources, that's
> only 75% of my 512MB card. Yet, TTM is not capable of getting all
I think the problem with Radeon/TTM is much deeper. Let me demonstrate
it on the following example.
Unigine Heaven needs about 385MB of space for static resources, that's
only 75% of my 512MB card. Yet, TTM is not capable of getting all of
that into VRAM. If I allow GTT placements, I get 20 fps, w
So i spend the day looking at ttm and eviction. The first patch i sent
earlier is i believe something that should be merged. This patch however
is more about discussing if other people are interested in similar mecanism
to be share among driver through ttm. I could otherwise just move its logic
to
So i spend the day looking at ttm and eviction. The first patch i sent
earlier is i believe something that should be merged. This patch however
is more about discussing if other people are interested in similar mecanism
to be share among driver through ttm. I could otherwise just move its logic
to
18 matches
Mail list logo
