On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 19:35:51 -0500
Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > That aside I guess I need to elaborate on what makes dpms special in
> > i915, and why there's a real difference between crtc->enable == true
> > && ->active == false and crtc->enabl
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Stéphane Marchesin
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After a few atomic irc chats I've shockingly realized that I've completely
>> ignored dpms handling in my helper series. Oops.
>>
>> But there's a few things whic
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> All this only matters for cloned configs anyway only, which is about
> i915 for gen2, roughly. Well Ville implemented cloning for some more
> recent stuff too.
Ok, I've grepped: Beside i915 there's only radeon which has a
possible_clones set
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
>>> Proposal: Only shut down anything (and then the hole output pipe with all
>>> cloned outputs) when all connector's dpms property is set to off. And
>>> enable it again as soon as one property goes to on.
>>
>> Well, it isn't quite the behavior
>> 2. Cloned configurations
>>
>> Currently dpms is set per-connector, and the crtc helpers only shut down
>> the specific encoder. Only when all connectors are off will it shut down
>> the crtc, too. That pretty much defeats the point of the new helpers of
>> always enabling/disabling a given outp
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> Proposal. Add a new boolean ->active to the crtc state, which will track
>>> the dpms state of the crtc. Add a helper to the atomic core functions
>>> which will compute ->active from the state update according to the
>>> proposals for issue
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After a few atomic irc chats I've shockingly realized that I've completely
>> ignored dpms handling in my helper series. Oops.
>>
>> But there's a few things which are seriousl
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After a few atomic irc chats I've shockingly realized that I've completely
> ignored dpms handling in my helper series. Oops.
>
> But there's a few things which are seriously wrong with DPMS, so I've
> figured I'll start a discussi
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After a few atomic irc chats I've shockingly realized that I've completely
> ignored dpms handling in my helper series. Oops.
>
> But there's a few things which are seriously wrong with DPMS, so I've
> figured I'll start a discus
Hi all,
After a few atomic irc chats I've shockingly realized that I've completely
ignored dpms handling in my helper series. Oops.
But there's a few things which are seriously wrong with DPMS, so I've
figured I'll start a discussion about them first - converting to atomic
looks like a good time
10 matches
Mail list logo
