Re: [RFC] Expanding drm_mode_modeinfo flags

2019-07-28 Thread Jeykumar Sankaran
On 2019-07-24 07:48, Sean Paul wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:50:43PM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote: On 2019-07-19 07:29, Sean Paul wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 05:15:28PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 09:55:58AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 201

Re: [RFC] Expanding drm_mode_modeinfo flags

2019-07-24 Thread Sean Paul
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:50:43PM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote: > On 2019-07-19 07:29, Sean Paul wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 05:15:28PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 09:55:58AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 11:05:53AM +0200, Daniel Vet

Re: [RFC] Expanding drm_mode_modeinfo flags

2019-07-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:50 AM Jeykumar Sankaran wrote: > > On 2019-07-19 07:29, Sean Paul wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 05:15:28PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 09:55:58AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > >> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 11:05:53AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote

Re: [RFC] Expanding drm_mode_modeinfo flags

2019-07-22 Thread Jeykumar Sankaran
On 2019-07-19 07:29, Sean Paul wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 05:15:28PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 09:55:58AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 11:05:53AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:18:42AM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:

Re: [RFC] Expanding drm_mode_modeinfo flags

2019-07-19 Thread Sean Paul
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 05:15:28PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 09:55:58AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 11:05:53AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:18:42AM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote: > > > > On 2019-07-16 02:07, Daniel

Re: [RFC] Expanding drm_mode_modeinfo flags

2019-07-19 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 09:55:58AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 11:05:53AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:18:42AM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote: > > > On 2019-07-16 02:07, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:46:44AM -0700, Jeykum

Re: [RFC] Expanding drm_mode_modeinfo flags

2019-07-19 Thread Sean Paul
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 11:05:53AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:18:42AM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote: > > On 2019-07-16 02:07, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:46:44AM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote: > > > > Hello All, > > > > drm_mode_

Re: [RFC] Expanding drm_mode_modeinfo flags

2019-07-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:18:42AM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote: > On 2019-07-16 02:07, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:46:44AM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > drm_mode_modeinfo::flags is a 32 bit field currently used to > > > describe

Re: [RFC] Expanding drm_mode_modeinfo flags

2019-07-18 Thread Jeykumar Sankaran
On 2019-07-16 02:07, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:46:44AM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote: Hello All, drm_mode_modeinfo::flags is a 32 bit field currently used to describe the properties of a connector mode. I see the least order 22 bits are already in use

Re: [RFC] Expanding drm_mode_modeinfo flags

2019-07-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:46:44AM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote: > Hello All, > drm_mode_modeinfo::flags is a 32 bit field currently used to > describe the properties of a connector mode. I see the least order 22 bits > are already in use. Posting this RFC to discuss on any pot

[RFC] Expanding drm_mode_modeinfo flags

2019-07-11 Thread Jeykumar Sankaran
Hello All, drm_mode_modeinfo::flags is a 32 bit field currently used to describe the properties of a connector mode. I see the least order 22 bits are already in use. Posting this RFC to discuss on any potential plans to expand the bit range support of this field for growi