On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 11:47:53AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:19 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:41 PM John Stultz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:43 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:57:44AM -0800, John Stult
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:41:44AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:43 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:57:44AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:58 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:48:32PM +, John
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 8:48 PM John Stultz wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:19 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:41 PM John Stultz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:43 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:57:44AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:19 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:41 PM John Stultz wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:43 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:57:44AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:58 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:41 PM John Stultz wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:43 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:57:44AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:58 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:48:32PM +, John Stultz w
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:43 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:57:44AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:58 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:48:32PM +, John Stultz wrote:
> > So even if the heaps are configured via DT (which at
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 2:30 PM Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>
> On 11/5/19 4:42 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:57:44AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:58 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:48:32PM +, John Stultz wrote:
> No
On 11/5/19 4:42 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:57:44AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:58 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:48:32PM +, John Stultz wrote:
Now that the DMA BUF heaps core code has been queued, I wanted
t
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:57:44AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:58 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:48:32PM +, John Stultz wrote:
> > > Now that the DMA BUF heaps core code has been queued, I wanted
> > > to send out some of the pending changes tha
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:58 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:48:32PM +, John Stultz wrote:
> > Now that the DMA BUF heaps core code has been queued, I wanted
> > to send out some of the pending changes that I've been working
> > on.
> >
> > For use with Android and their GK
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:48:32PM +, John Stultz wrote:
> Now that the DMA BUF heaps core code has been queued, I wanted
> to send out some of the pending changes that I've been working
> on.
>
> For use with Android and their GKI effort, it is desired that
> DMA BUF heaps are able to be load
Now that the DMA BUF heaps core code has been queued, I wanted
to send out some of the pending changes that I've been working
on.
For use with Android and their GKI effort, it is desired that
DMA BUF heaps are able to be loaded as modules. This is required
for migrating vendors off of ION which wa
12 matches
Mail list logo
