Hi,
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:13:55PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> On 10/17/2017 07:57 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> >This is going to be a*lot* of churn throughout the tree, if we expect
> >all resource consumers to do this. I think we'd want some kind of
> >agreement from the PM maintainers and (lar
Hi Brian,
On 10/17/2017 07:57 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
This is going to be a*lot* of churn throughout the tree, if we expect
all resource consumers to do this. I think we'd want some kind of
agreement from the PM maintainers and (larger) subsystem owners before
going down this route...
And in t
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 06:06:37PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> When the pwm driver is unbound, the pwm_bl driver would still hold a
> reference to that pwm, and crash the kernel later(if someone trying
> to access that invalid pwm).
This is not the primary problem you're trying to address thou
When the pwm driver is unbound, the pwm_bl driver would still hold a
reference to that pwm, and crash the kernel later(if someone trying
to access that invalid pwm).
Add a device link to avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen
---
Changes in v2: None
drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 2 ++
1 f
