> How does this patch look?
Looks better now, yes. This patch is Reviewed-by: Christian K?nig
The next one we need to take a look at is "drm/radeon: use rcu waits in
some ioctls":
> @@ -110,9 +110,12 @@ static int radeon_gem_set_domain(struct
> drm_gem_object *gobj,
> }
> if (d
Op 02-09-14 om 11:52 schreef Christian K?nig:
> Am 02.09.2014 um 11:12 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>> Op 02-09-14 om 10:51 schreef Christian K?nig:
>>> Am 01.09.2014 um 20:43 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
Hey,
On 01-09-14 18:21, Christian K?nig wrote:
> Am 01.09.2014 um 15:33 schrieb
Am 02.09.2014 um 11:12 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> Op 02-09-14 om 10:51 schreef Christian K?nig:
>> Am 01.09.2014 um 20:43 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> On 01-09-14 18:21, Christian K?nig wrote:
Am 01.09.2014 um 15:33 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> Hey,
>
> Op 01-09-14
Op 02-09-14 om 10:51 schreef Christian K?nig:
> Am 01.09.2014 um 20:43 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>> Hey,
>>
>> On 01-09-14 18:21, Christian K?nig wrote:
>>> Am 01.09.2014 um 15:33 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
Hey,
Op 01-09-14 om 14:31 schreef Christian K?nig:
> Please wait a secon
Am 01.09.2014 um 20:43 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> Hey,
>
> On 01-09-14 18:21, Christian K?nig wrote:
>> Am 01.09.2014 um 15:33 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> Op 01-09-14 om 14:31 schreef Christian K?nig:
Please wait a second with that.
I didn't had a chance to test thi
Hey,
On 01-09-14 18:21, Christian K?nig wrote:
> Am 01.09.2014 um 15:33 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>> Hey,
>>
>> Op 01-09-14 om 14:31 schreef Christian K?nig:
>>> Please wait a second with that.
>>>
>>> I didn't had a chance to test this yet and nobody has yet given it's rb on
>>> at least the ra
Am 01.09.2014 um 15:33 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> Hey,
>
> Op 01-09-14 om 14:31 schreef Christian K?nig:
>> Please wait a second with that.
>>
>> I didn't had a chance to test this yet and nobody has yet given it's rb on
>> at least the radeon changes in this branch.
> Ok, my fault. I thought it
Hey,
Op 01-09-14 om 14:31 schreef Christian K?nig:
> Please wait a second with that.
>
> I didn't had a chance to test this yet and nobody has yet given it's rb on at
> least the radeon changes in this branch.
Ok, my fault. I thought it was implicitly acked. I haven't made any functional
changes
Please wait a second with that.
I didn't had a chance to test this yet and nobody has yet given it's rb
on at least the radeon changes in this branch.
Christian.
Am 01.09.2014 um 13:34 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> The following changes since commit 04cd214516d8a6f0f8c0116185d6e360df0860d2:
>
>
The following changes since commit 04cd214516d8a6f0f8c0116185d6e360df0860d2:
Merge branch 'drm-next-3.18' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux
into drm-next (2014-08-28 13:45:45 +1000)
are available in the git repository at:
ssh://people.freedesktop.org/~mlankhorst/linux for-airlied
10 matches
Mail list logo
