On 07.11.2014 18:36, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> If we still feel that exiting Weston on the first timestamp failure
> (zero or not increasing) is too harsh, we could simply log a warning
> and add again some heuristics on when things are too far wrong to
> continue.
>
> E.g. getting a single timesta
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 07:04:16 +0100
Mario Kleiner wrote:
> On 06/11/14 17:42, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 16:08:56 +0900
> > Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> >> On 06.11.2014 03:06, Frederic Plourde wrote:
> >>> Many features, like animations, hardly depend on page flip timestamps
>
On 06/11/14 17:42, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 16:08:56 +0900
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
>> On 06.11.2014 03:06, Frederic Plourde wrote:
>>> Many features, like animations, hardly depend on page flip timestamps
>>> to work properly, but some DRM drivers do not correctly support page
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 16:08:56 +0900
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 06.11.2014 03:06, Frederic Plourde wrote:
> > Many features, like animations, hardly depend on page flip timestamps
> > to work properly, but some DRM drivers do not correctly support page flip
> > timestamps (or not at all) and in tha