Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] dmr/bridge: add a .destroy func

2025-05-28 Thread Anusha Srivatsa
Luca, while you are sending a new revision, the patch subject says dmr instead of drm. Kindly make that change. Thanks, Anusha On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 7:51 AM Luca Ceresoli wrote: > Hi Maxime, > > On Thu, 22 May 2025 17:43:37 +0200 > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 06:48:38

Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] dmr/bridge: add a .destroy func

2025-05-26 Thread Luca Ceresoli
Hi Maxime, On Thu, 22 May 2025 17:43:37 +0200 Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 06:48:38PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > > Some users of DRM bridges may need to execute specific code just before > > deallocation. > > > > As of now the only known user would be KUnit tests. > > > >

Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] dmr/bridge: add a .destroy func

2025-05-22 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 06:48:38PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > Some users of DRM bridges may need to execute specific code just before > deallocation. > > As of now the only known user would be KUnit tests. > > Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard > Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli > > --- > > This patc

[PATCH v8 2/3] dmr/bridge: add a .destroy func

2025-05-16 Thread Luca Ceresoli
Some users of DRM bridges may need to execute specific code just before deallocation. As of now the only known user would be KUnit tests. Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli --- This patch is new in v8. The .destroy callback had appeared in v5 as well [5], but as part of