On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 5:14 PM Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> this is another try to convince the relevant people that
> devm_clk_get_enabled() is a nice idea. Compared to v7 (back in May 2021) this
> series is rebased to v5.17-rc8 and converts quite some drivers that open code
> devm_clk
Hello,
this is another try to convince the relevant people that
devm_clk_get_enabled() is a nice idea. Compared to v7 (back in May 2021) this
series is rebased to v5.17-rc8 and converts quite some drivers that open code
devm_clk_get_enabled() up to now (patches #3 - #11).
A concern about devm_clk