Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs

2021-07-22 Thread Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
On 21/7/21 9:23 pm, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 2:44 PM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote: On 21/7/21 6:29 pm, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 6:12 AM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote: On 21/7/21 2:24 am, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:35:03PM +0800, Desm

Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs

2021-07-21 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 2:44 PM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote: > On 21/7/21 6:29 pm, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 6:12 AM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi > > wrote: > >> On 21/7/21 2:24 am, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:35:03PM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote: >

Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs

2021-07-21 Thread Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
On 21/7/21 6:29 pm, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 6:12 AM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote: On 21/7/21 2:24 am, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:35:03PM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote: Hi, In the previous thread on this series we decided to remove a patch that wa

Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs

2021-07-21 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 6:12 AM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote: > On 21/7/21 2:24 am, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:35:03PM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> In the previous thread on this series we decided to remove a patch that > >> was violating a lockde

Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs

2021-07-20 Thread Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
On 21/7/21 2:24 am, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:35:03PM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote: Hi, In the previous thread on this series we decided to remove a patch that was violating a lockdep requirement in drm_lease. In addition to this change, I took a closer look at the

Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs

2021-07-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:35:03PM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote: > Hi, > > In the previous thread on this series we decided to remove a patch that was > violating a lockdep requirement in drm_lease. In addition to this change, I > took a closer look at the CI logs for the Basic Acceptance

[PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs

2021-07-11 Thread Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
Hi, In the previous thread on this series we decided to remove a patch that was violating a lockdep requirement in drm_lease. In addition to this change, I took a closer look at the CI logs for the Basic Acceptance Tests and noticed that another regression was introduced. The new patch 2 is a r