On 12/27/2022 11:54 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 04:39:09PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 at 18:36, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 22:06, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 02:40:55PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Wed,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 04:39:09PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 at 18:36, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 22:06, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 02:40:55PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 17:55, Bjorn Andersson
On 12/12/2022 9:09 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 at 18:36, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 22:06, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 02:40:55PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 17:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2022
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 at 18:36, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 22:06, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 02:40:55PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 17:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 05:00:51PM +0100, Ulf Han
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 22:06, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 02:40:55PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 17:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 05:00:51PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 23:57, Bjorn Andersso
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 02:40:55PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 17:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 05:00:51PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 23:57, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:36:58PM +053
On 12/7/2022 9:30 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 23:57, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:36:58PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> @Ulf, Akhil has a power-domain for a piece of hardware which may be
>> voted active by multiple different subsystems (co-processors/e
On 12/8/2022 7:10 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 17:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 05:00:51PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 23:57, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:36:58PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
@Ulf, Ak
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 17:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 05:00:51PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 23:57, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:36:58PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > @Ulf, Akhil has a power-doma
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 05:00:51PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 23:57, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:36:58PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> > >
> >
> > @Ulf, Akhil has a power-domain for a piece of hardware which may be
> > voted active by multiple
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 23:57, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:36:58PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> >
>
> @Ulf, Akhil has a power-domain for a piece of hardware which may be
> voted active by multiple different subsystems (co-processors/execution
> contexts) in the system.
>
On 12/2/2022 12:30 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On 12/2/2022 4:27 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:36:58PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> @Ulf, Akhil has a power-domain for a piece of hardware which may be
>> voted active by multiple different subsystems (co-processors/execu
On 12/2/2022 4:27 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:36:58PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> @Ulf, Akhil has a power-domain for a piece of hardware which may be
> voted active by multiple different subsystems (co-processors/execution
> contexts) in the system.
>
> As such, durin
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:36:58PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>
@Ulf, Akhil has a power-domain for a piece of hardware which may be
voted active by multiple different subsystems (co-processors/execution
contexts) in the system.
As such, during the powering down sequence we don't wait for the
p
On 10/5/2022 2:36 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
Some clients like adreno gpu driver would like to ensure that its gdsc
is collapsed at hardware during a gpu reset sequence. This is because it
has a votable gdsc which could be ON due to a vote from another subsystem
like tz, hyp etc or due to an inter
Some clients like adreno gpu driver would like to ensure that its gdsc
is collapsed at hardware during a gpu reset sequence. This is because it
has a votable gdsc which could be ON due to a vote from another subsystem
like tz, hyp etc or due to an internal hardware signal. To allow
this, gpucc dr
16 matches
Mail list logo
