Hi Simon,
Thanks! Yes, this kernel patch should work with latest libdrm.
Best regards!
James Zhu
On 2023-08-23 06:53, Simon Ser wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8th, 2023 at 17:04, James Zhu wrote:
I have a MR for libdrm to support drm nodes type up to 2^MINORBITS
nodes which can work with these
On Wednesday, August 23rd, 2023 at 12:53, Simon Ser wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8th, 2023 at 17:04, James Zhu jam...@amd.com wrote:
>
> > I have a MR for libdrm to support drm nodes type up to 2^MINORBITS
> > nodes which can work with these patches,
> >
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/d
On Tuesday, August 8th, 2023 at 17:04, James Zhu wrote:
> I have a MR for libdrm to support drm nodes type up to 2^MINORBITS
> nodes which can work with these patches,
>
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/-/merge_requests/305
FWIW, this MR has been merged, so in theory this kernel patch
I would like if these kernel patches are accepted by everyone, If yes,
when they can be upstream.
I have a MR for libdrm to support drm nodes type up to 2^MINORBITS
nodes which can work with these patches,
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/-/merge_requests/305
Thanks!
James
On 2023-
Am 28.07.23 um 16:22 schrieb Simon Ser:
On Thursday, July 27th, 2023 at 14:01, Christian König
wrote:
We do need patches to stop trying to infer the node type from the minor
in libdrm, though. Emil has suggested using sysfs, which we already do
in a few places in libdrm.
That sounds like a r
On Thursday, July 27th, 2023 at 14:01, Christian König
wrote:
> > We do need patches to stop trying to infer the node type from the minor
> > in libdrm, though. Emil has suggested using sysfs, which we already do
> > in a few places in libdrm.
>
> That sounds like a really good idea to me as we
Am 26.07.23 um 20:15 schrieb Simon Ser:
On Monday, July 24th, 2023 at 23:14, Michał Winiarski
wrote:
Having a limit of 64 DRM devices is not good enough for modern world
where we have multi-GPU servers, SR-IOV virtual functions and virtual
devices used for testing.
Let's utilize full minor ra
On Monday, July 24th, 2023 at 23:14, Michał Winiarski
wrote:
> Having a limit of 64 DRM devices is not good enough for modern world
> where we have multi-GPU servers, SR-IOV virtual functions and virtual
> devices used for testing.
> Let's utilize full minor range for DRM devices.
> To avoid reg
On 2023-07-24 17:14, Michał Winiarski wrote:
Having a limit of 64 DRM devices is not good enough for modern world
where we have multi-GPU servers, SR-IOV virtual functions and virtual
devices used for testing.
Let's utilize full minor range for DRM devices.
To avoid regressing the existing users
Having a limit of 64 DRM devices is not good enough for modern world
where we have multi-GPU servers, SR-IOV virtual functions and virtual
devices used for testing.
Let's utilize full minor range for DRM devices.
To avoid regressing the existing userspace, we're still maintaining the
numbering sche
10 matches
Mail list logo
