Hi,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 2:34 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Doug Anderson (2023-01-18 10:29:59)
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 6:16 PM Kuogee Hsieh
> > wrote:
> > > +
> > > if (isr & DP_INTR_AUX_ERROR) {
> > > aux->aux_error_num = DP_AUX_ERR_PHY;
> > >
Quoting Doug Anderson (2023-01-18 10:29:59)
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 6:16 PM Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> > +
> > if (isr & DP_INTR_AUX_ERROR) {
> > aux->aux_error_num = DP_AUX_ERR_PHY;
> > dp_catalog_aux_clear_hw_interrupts(aux->catalog);
> > +
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 6:16 PM Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>
> dp_display_irq_handler() is the main isr handler with the helps
> of two sub isr, dp_aux_isr and dp_ctrl_isr, to service all DP
> interrupts on every irq triggered. Current all three isr does
> not return IRQ_HANDLED if there are any int
On 28/12/2022 04:16, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
dp_display_irq_handler() is the main isr handler with the helps
of two sub isr, dp_aux_isr and dp_ctrl_isr, to service all DP
interrupts on every irq triggered. Current all three isr does
not return IRQ_HANDLED if there are any interrupts it had
serviced.
dp_display_irq_handler() is the main isr handler with the helps
of two sub isr, dp_aux_isr and dp_ctrl_isr, to service all DP
interrupts on every irq triggered. Current all three isr does
not return IRQ_HANDLED if there are any interrupts it had
serviced. This patch fix this ambiguity by having all
