On 23.06.2015 11:28, Inki Dae wrote:
> On 2015ë
06ì 23ì¼ 11:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> 2015-06-22 21:35 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski :
>>> 2015-06-22 20:42 GMT+09:00 Inki Dae :
+ Krzysztof
On 2015ë
06ì 22ì¼ 18:10, Inki Dae wrote:
> On 2015ë
06ì 12ì¼ 21:59,
On 2015ë
06ì 23ì¼ 11:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2015-06-22 21:35 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski :
>> 2015-06-22 20:42 GMT+09:00 Inki Dae :
>>> + Krzysztof
>>>
>>> On 2015ë
06ì 22ì¼ 18:10, Inki Dae wrote:
On 2015ë
06ì 12ì¼ 21:59, Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
> The clock which w
2015-06-22 21:35 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski :
> 2015-06-22 20:42 GMT+09:00 Inki Dae :
>> + Krzysztof
>>
>> On 2015ë
06ì 22ì¼ 18:10, Inki Dae wrote:
>>> On 2015ë
06ì 12ì¼ 21:59, Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
The clock which was named as 'pll_clk' is actually not the clock source
of PL
2015-06-22 20:42 GMT+09:00 Inki Dae :
> + Krzysztof
>
> On 2015ë
06ì 22ì¼ 18:10, Inki Dae wrote:
>> On 2015ë
06ì 12ì¼ 21:59, Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
>>> The clock which was named as 'pll_clk' is actually not the clock source
>>> of PLL in MIPI DSI. This patch fixes this disagreement.
>>
>>
2015-06-22 21:10 GMT+09:00 Inki Dae :
> On 2015ë
06ì 22ì¼ 20:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> 2015-06-22 20:42 GMT+09:00 Inki Dae :
>>> + Krzysztof
>>>
>>> On 2015ë
06ì 22ì¼ 18:10, Inki Dae wrote:
On 2015ë
06ì 12ì¼ 21:59, Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
> The clock which was named as
On 2015ë
06ì 22ì¼ 20:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2015-06-22 20:42 GMT+09:00 Inki Dae :
>> + Krzysztof
>>
>> On 2015ë
06ì 22ì¼ 18:10, Inki Dae wrote:
>>> On 2015ë
06ì 12ì¼ 21:59, Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
The clock which was named as 'pll_clk' is actually not the clock source
>>
2015-06-22 20:42 GMT+09:00 Inki Dae :
> + Krzysztof
>
> On 2015ë
06ì 22ì¼ 18:10, Inki Dae wrote:
>> On 2015ë
06ì 12ì¼ 21:59, Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
>>> The clock which was named as 'pll_clk' is actually not the clock source
>>> of PLL in MIPI DSI. This patch fixes this disagreement.
>>
>>
+ Krzysztof
On 2015ë
06ì 22ì¼ 18:10, Inki Dae wrote:
> On 2015ë
06ì 12ì¼ 21:59, Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
>> The clock which was named as 'pll_clk' is actually not the clock source
>> of PLL in MIPI DSI. This patch fixes this disagreement.
>
> Mr. Kukjin and Krzysztof, can you give me Acked
On 2015ë
06ì 12ì¼ 21:59, Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
> The clock which was named as 'pll_clk' is actually not the clock source
> of PLL in MIPI DSI. This patch fixes this disagreement.
Mr. Kukjin and Krzysztof, can you give me Acked-by or Singed-off-by? I'd
like to merge this patch to mainline thro
The clock which was named as 'pll_clk' is actually not the clock source
of PLL in MIPI DSI. This patch fixes this disagreement.
Signed-off-by: Hyungwon Hwang
---
Changes before:
- Refer https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6191811
Changes for v6:
- None
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 2 +-
1 fi
10 matches
Mail list logo