On Wed, 2024-08-07 at 23:44 +, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 05:38:13PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > The XE_PL_TT watermark was set to 50% of system memory.
> > The idea behind that was unclear since the net effect is that
> > TT memory will be evicted to TTM_PL_SYSTEM me
On Wed, 2024-08-07 at 23:13 +, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 12:35:34PM -0600, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 17:38 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > > The XE_PL_TT watermark was set to 50% of system memory.
> > > The idea behind that was unclear since the net ef
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 05:38:13PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> The XE_PL_TT watermark was set to 50% of system memory.
> The idea behind that was unclear since the net effect is that
> TT memory will be evicted to TTM_PL_SYSTEM memory if that
> watermark is exceeded, requiring PPGTT rebinds an
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 12:35:34PM -0600, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 17:38 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > The XE_PL_TT watermark was set to 50% of system memory.
> > The idea behind that was unclear since the net effect is that
> > TT memory will be evicted to TTM_PL_SYSTEM memo
On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 17:38 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> The XE_PL_TT watermark was set to 50% of system memory.
> The idea behind that was unclear since the net effect is that
> TT memory will be evicted to TTM_PL_SYSTEM memory if that
> watermark is exceeded, requiring PPGTT rebinds and dma
>
The XE_PL_TT watermark was set to 50% of system memory.
The idea behind that was unclear since the net effect is that
TT memory will be evicted to TTM_PL_SYSTEM memory if that
watermark is exceeded, requiring PPGTT rebinds and dma
remapping. But there is no similar watermark for TTM_PL_SYSTEM
memor
