On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 04:31:27PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-08-08 at 01:37 +, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 05:38:12PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > > Rather than relying on the TTM watermark accounting add a shrinker
> > > for xe_bos in TT or system
Hi,
On 03/07/2024 16:38, Thomas Hellström wrote:
Rather than relying on the TTM watermark accounting add a shrinker
for xe_bos in TT or system memory.
Leverage the newly added TTM per-page shrinking and shmem backup
support.
Although xe doesn't fully support WONTNEED (purgeable) bos yet,
intro
On Thu, 2024-08-08 at 01:37 +, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 05:38:12PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > Rather than relying on the TTM watermark accounting add a shrinker
> > for xe_bos in TT or system memory.
> >
> > Leverage the newly added TTM per-page shrinking and shme
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 05:38:12PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Rather than relying on the TTM watermark accounting add a shrinker
> for xe_bos in TT or system memory.
>
> Leverage the newly added TTM per-page shrinking and shmem backup
> support.
>
> Although xe doesn't fully support WONTNEE
Rather than relying on the TTM watermark accounting add a shrinker
for xe_bos in TT or system memory.
Leverage the newly added TTM per-page shrinking and shmem backup
support.
Although xe doesn't fully support WONTNEED (purgeable) bos yet,
introduce and add shrinker support for purgeable ttm_tts.
