On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 06:10:25PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> On 08/03/2025 at 02:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 01:48:48AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
> > wrote:
> >> From: Vincent Mailhol
> >>
> >> In an upcoming change, GENMASK() and its friends will indire
On 19/03/2025 at 01:06, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 06:10:25PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
>> On 08/03/2025 at 02:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 01:48:48AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
>>> wrote:
From: Vincent Mailhol
In an upcoming
On 08/03/2025 at 02:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 01:48:48AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Vincent Mailhol
>>
>> In an upcoming change, GENMASK() and its friends will indirectly
>> depend on sizeof() which is not available in asm.
>>
>> Instead of addin
From: Vincent Mailhol
In an upcoming change, GENMASK() and its friends will indirectly
depend on sizeof() which is not available in asm.
Instead of adding further complexity to __GENMASK() to make it work
for both asm and non asm, just split the definition of the two
variants.
Signed-off-by: Vi
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 01:48:48AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Vincent Mailhol
>
> In an upcoming change, GENMASK() and its friends will indirectly
> depend on sizeof() which is not available in asm.
>
> Instead of adding further complexity to __GENMASK() to make it work
>
