On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 02:41:25PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 02:23:13PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 15:51 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:04:53PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > > > DisplayPort branch device may define
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 02:23:13PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 15:51 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:04:53PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > > DisplayPort branch device may define max supported bits per
> > > component. Update display info based on thi
On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 15:51 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:04:53PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > DisplayPort branch device may define max supported bits per
> > component. Update display info based on this value if bpc
> > is defined.
> >
> > v2: cleanup to match the drm_
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:04:53PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> DisplayPort branch device may define max supported bits per
> component. Update display info based on this value if bpc
> is defined.
>
> v2: cleanup to match the drm_dp_helper.c patches introduced
> earlier in this series
>
> Sig
DisplayPort branch device may define max supported bits per
component. Update display info based on this value if bpc
is defined.
v2: cleanup to match the drm_dp_helper.c patches introduced
earlier in this series
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 9 +
