On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 03:08:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:47:39 -0400 jgli...@redhat.com wrote:
>
> > From: Jérôme Glisse
> >
> > (Andrew this apply on top of my HMM patchset as otherwise you will have
> > conflict with changes to mm/hmm.c)
> >
> > Changes since v
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:47:39 -0400 jgli...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Jérôme Glisse
>
> (Andrew this apply on top of my HMM patchset as otherwise you will have
> conflict with changes to mm/hmm.c)
>
> Changes since v5:
> - drop KVM bits waiting for KVM people to express interest if they
>
Andrew anything blocking this for 5.2 ? Should i ask people (ie the end
user of this) to re-ack v6 (it is the same as previous version just rebase
and dropped kvm bits).
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:47:39PM -0400, jgli...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Jérôme Glisse
>
> (Andrew this apply on top of m
From: Jérôme Glisse
(Andrew this apply on top of my HMM patchset as otherwise you will have
conflict with changes to mm/hmm.c)
Changes since v5:
- drop KVM bits waiting for KVM people to express interest if they
do not then i will post patchset to remove change_pte_notify as
wit
