On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:22 AM, David Herrmann
wrote:
> We already expose of_platform_device_create(), but give the caller no
> chance to revert its effect. Make sure we also provide the counterpart
> of_platform_device_destroy().
>
> This requires a small refactoring, since so far the internal
We already expose of_platform_device_create(), but give the caller no
chance to revert its effect. Make sure we also provide the counterpart
of_platform_device_destroy().
This requires a small refactoring, since so far the internal destructor
is used as iterator to for_each_device(), but we don't
