On 03/04/2020 19:18, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 06:43:20PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 18/03/2020 12:45, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>> From: Matthias Kaehlcke
>>>
>>> Now that devfreq supports limiting the frequency range of a device
>>> through PM QoS make
On 18/03/2020 12:45, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> From: Matthias Kaehlcke
>
> Now that devfreq supports limiting the frequency range of a device
> through PM QoS make use of it instead of disabling OPPs that should
> not be used.
>
> The switch from disabling OPPs to PM QoS introduces a subtle behaviora
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 06:43:20PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 18/03/2020 12:45, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> > From: Matthias Kaehlcke
> >
> > Now that devfreq supports limiting the frequency range of a device
> > through PM QoS make use of it instead of disabling OPPs that should
> >
From: Matthias Kaehlcke
Now that devfreq supports limiting the frequency range of a device
through PM QoS make use of it instead of disabling OPPs that should
not be used.
The switch from disabling OPPs to PM QoS introduces a subtle behavioral
change in case of conflicting requests (min > max):
