Ah, sorry thanks for pointing that out. We did discuss previously. I
will go ahead and change it.
On 2022-02-07 3:57 a.m., Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 04/02/2022 16:37, Michael Cheng wrote:
Drop invalidate_csb_entries and directly call drm_clflush_virt_range.
This allows for one less function ca
On 04/02/2022 16:37, Michael Cheng wrote:
Drop invalidate_csb_entries and directly call drm_clflush_virt_range.
This allows for one less function call, and prevent complier errors when
building for non-x86 architectures.
v2(Michael Cheng): Drop invalidate_csb_entries function and directly
Drop invalidate_csb_entries and directly call drm_clflush_virt_range.
This allows for one less function call, and prevent complier errors when
building for non-x86 architectures.
v2(Michael Cheng): Drop invalidate_csb_entries function and directly
invoke drm_clflush_virt_range.
