Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/panthor: Make the timeout per-queue instead of per-job

2025-06-12 Thread Steven Price
On 03/06/2025 10:49, Ashley Smith wrote: > The timeout logic provided by drm_sched leads to races when we try > to suspend it while the drm_sched workqueue queues more jobs. Let's > overhaul the timeout handling in panthor to have our own delayed work > that's resumed/suspended when a group is resu

Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/panthor: Make the timeout per-queue instead of per-job

2025-06-12 Thread Liviu Dudau
On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 10:49:32AM +0100, Ashley Smith wrote: > The timeout logic provided by drm_sched leads to races when we try > to suspend it while the drm_sched workqueue queues more jobs. Let's > overhaul the timeout handling in panthor to have our own delayed work > that's resumed/suspended

[PATCH v5 2/2] drm/panthor: Make the timeout per-queue instead of per-job

2025-06-03 Thread Ashley Smith
The timeout logic provided by drm_sched leads to races when we try to suspend it while the drm_sched workqueue queues more jobs. Let's overhaul the timeout handling in panthor to have our own delayed work that's resumed/suspended when a group is resumed/suspended. When an actual timeout occurs, we