On Thu, 01 Feb 2024, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> We've discussed that on IRC today. I'm not sure there was a conclusion
> other than "well this doesn't seem right". I think we should at least
> provide different EDIDs depending on the connector type indeed, but
> there was also a few discussions that a
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 03:33:24PM +, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> Hi Maxime
>
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 12:51, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 03:10:43PM +, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> > > > +static bool
> > > > +sink_supports_format_bpc(const struct drm_connector *connector,
>
Hi Maxime
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 12:51, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 03:10:43PM +, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> > > +static bool
> > > +sink_supports_format_bpc(const struct drm_connector *connector,
> > > +const struct drm_display_info *info,
> > > +
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 03:10:43PM +, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> > +static bool
> > +sink_supports_format_bpc(const struct drm_connector *connector,
> > +const struct drm_display_info *info,
> > +const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> > +
Hi Maxime
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 15:50, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> Now that we have all the infrastructure needed, we can add some code
> that will, for a given connector state and mode, compute the best output
> format and bpc.
>
> The algorithm is the same one than the one already found in i915 an
Now that we have all the infrastructure needed, we can add some code
that will, for a given connector state and mode, compute the best output
format and bpc.
The algorithm is the same one than the one already found in i915 and
vc4.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_sta
