Re: [PATCH v5 10/15] drm/bridge: tc358767: Add support for address-only I2C transfers

2019-06-18 Thread Andrey Smirnov
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:22 AM Andrey Smirnov wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 5:48 AM Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On 12/06/2019 11:32, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > > > Transfer size of zero means a request to do an address-only > > > transfer. Since the HW support this, we probably s

Re: [PATCH v5 10/15] drm/bridge: tc358767: Add support for address-only I2C transfers

2019-06-12 Thread Andrey Smirnov
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 5:48 AM Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > Hi, > > On 12/06/2019 11:32, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > > Transfer size of zero means a request to do an address-only > > transfer. Since the HW support this, we probably shouldn't be just > > ignoring such requests. While at it allow DP_AUX_I

Re: [PATCH v5 10/15] drm/bridge: tc358767: Add support for address-only I2C transfers

2019-06-12 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
Hi, On 12/06/2019 11:32, Andrey Smirnov wrote: Transfer size of zero means a request to do an address-only transfer. Since the HW support this, we probably shouldn't be just ignoring such requests. While at it allow DP_AUX_I2C_MOT flag to pass through, since it is supported by the HW as well.

[PATCH v5 10/15] drm/bridge: tc358767: Add support for address-only I2C transfers

2019-06-12 Thread Andrey Smirnov
Transfer size of zero means a request to do an address-only transfer. Since the HW support this, we probably shouldn't be just ignoring such requests. While at it allow DP_AUX_I2C_MOT flag to pass through, since it is supported by the HW as well. Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov Reviewed-by: Andrzej