On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 05:02:10PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> On 28.02.24 16:37, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > Hi Javier,
> >
> > Thanks for moving this patch to the front of the series!
> >
> > A few more comments inline.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 02:51:28PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wro
On 28.02.24 16:37, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> Thanks for moving this patch to the front of the series!
>
> A few more comments inline.
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 02:51:28PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>> The current implementation uses generic names for the power supplies,
>> w
Hi Javier,
Thanks for moving this patch to the front of the series!
A few more comments inline.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 02:51:28PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> The current implementation uses generic names for the power supplies,
> which conflicts with proper name definitions in the device bi
The current implementation uses generic names for the power supplies,
which conflicts with proper name definitions in the device bindings.
Add a per-device property to include real supply names and keep generic
names for existing devices to keep backward compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Javier Carra