23.03.2021 22:57, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 23.03.2021 21:21, Thierry Reding пишет:
>> On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 02:19:39PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> 03.02.2021 14:18, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
>>> ...
> I'll need more time to think about it.
>
How about something like this:
>>>
23.03.2021 21:21, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 02:19:39PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 03.02.2021 14:18, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
>> ...
I'll need more time to think about it.
>>>
>>> How about something like this:
>>>
>>> Turn the syncpt_incr field back into an array
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 02:19:39PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 03.02.2021 14:18, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
> ...
> >> I'll need more time to think about it.
> >>
> >
> > How about something like this:
> >
> > Turn the syncpt_incr field back into an array of structs like
> >
> > #define DRM_TEGR
On 2/27/21 1:19 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
03.02.2021 14:18, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
...
I'll need more time to think about it.
How about something like this:
Turn the syncpt_incr field back into an array of structs like
#define DRM_TEGRA_SUBMIT_SYNCPT_INCR_REPLACE_SYNCOBJ (1<<0)
#def
03.02.2021 14:18, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
...
>> I'll need more time to think about it.
>>
>
> How about something like this:
>
> Turn the syncpt_incr field back into an array of structs like
>
> #define DRM_TEGRA_SUBMIT_SYNCPT_INCR_REPLACE_SYNCOBJ (1<<0)
> #define DRM_TEGRA_SUBMIT_SYNCPT_
On 1/29/21 7:30 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
28.01.2021 19:58, Thierry Reding пишет:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 01:08:54PM +0200, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
On 1/27/21 11:20 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
26.01.2021 05:45, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
2. We will probably need a dedicated drm_tegra_submit_cmd fo
28.01.2021 19:58, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 01:08:54PM +0200, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
>> On 1/27/21 11:20 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> 26.01.2021 05:45, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
> 2. We will probably need a dedicated drm_tegra_submit_cmd for sync point
> increments. Th
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 01:08:54PM +0200, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> On 1/27/21 11:20 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > 26.01.2021 05:45, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
> > > > 2. We will probably need a dedicated drm_tegra_submit_cmd for sync point
> > > > increments. The job's sync point will be allocated dy
On 1/27/21 11:20 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
26.01.2021 05:45, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
2. We will probably need a dedicated drm_tegra_submit_cmd for sync point
increments. The job's sync point will be allocated dynamically when job
is submitted. We will need a fag for the sync_incr and wait_sync
26.01.2021 05:45, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
>> 2. We will probably need a dedicated drm_tegra_submit_cmd for sync point
>> increments. The job's sync point will be allocated dynamically when job
>> is submitted. We will need a fag for the sync_incr and wait_syncpt
>> commands, saying "it's a job's s
10 matches
Mail list logo
