[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-04-07 Thread Shawn Guo
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 12:05:35PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > Did you get any chance to reproduce this dual display issue? Now it > > shows on mainline kernel. > > I have not yet reproduced, but I've sent a patch today ("imx-drm: > imx-drm-core: Fix imx_drm_encoder_get_mux_id") that might fi

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-04-07 Thread Shawn Guo
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:09:27AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > So no EDID. Did you update the "ddc" property to "ddc-i2c-bus" ? Ah, right. This is exactly the cause. Thanks, Russell. Shawn

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-04-07 Thread Philipp Zabel
Am Montag, den 07.04.2014, 12:05 +0200 schrieb Philipp Zabel: > Hi Shawn, > > Am Montag, den 07.04.2014, 12:23 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:46:11AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > I just came across a couple problems when testing the series on > > > my imx6dl-sabresd board

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-04-07 Thread Shawn Guo
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:46:11AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > I just came across a couple problems when testing the series on > my imx6dl-sabresd board in dual display case - HDMI + LVDS. I tested it > using Russell's branch below, which I believe has all the pieces put > together. > > git://ftp

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-04-07 Thread Philipp Zabel
Hi Shawn, Am Montag, den 07.04.2014, 12:23 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:46:11AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > I just came across a couple problems when testing the series on > > my imx6dl-sabresd board in dual display case - HDMI + LVDS. I tested it > > using Russell's bran

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-04-07 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 12:23:37PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > And I see another HDMI regression with my testing on mainline kernel. I > can have my HDMI work at 1920x1080 with v3.14 kernel, but it can only > probes 1024x768 with the mainline today. Works for me here. > [20.606] (II) LoadModul

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-03-11 Thread Shawn Guo
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 02:34:38PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > > Sorry, Philipp. The setup in my report is incorrect. The correct setup > > to see this issue consists of: > > > > 1) build a kernel without HDMI support, i.e. !CONFIG_DRM_IMX_HDMI > > > > 2) enable HDMI device in DT, i.e. adding t

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-03-11 Thread Shawn Guo
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:42:08PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2014, 11:46 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo: > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:20:51AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > this latest version of the imx-drm DT binding patches applies > > > o

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-03-11 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2014, 21:27 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:42:08PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > Hi Shawn, > > > > Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2014, 11:46 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo: > > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:20:51AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > >

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-03-11 Thread Philipp Zabel
Hi Shawn, Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2014, 11:46 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:20:51AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this latest version of the imx-drm DT binding patches applies > > on top of staging-next and also depends on the OF graph binding > > patchset tha

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-03-11 Thread Shawn Guo
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:20:51AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Hi, > > this latest version of the imx-drm DT binding patches applies > on top of staging-next and also depends on the OF graph binding > patchset that moves the v4l2_of helpers to drivers/of. > Currently, the two patchsets are also

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-03-07 Thread Philipp Zabel
[Added Shawn to Cc:] On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 05:56:12PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:20:51AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > this latest version of the imx-drm DT binding patches app

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-03-07 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 07:57:51PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > [Added Shawn to Cc:] > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 05:56:12PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:20:51AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: >

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-03-07 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:20:51AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Hi, > > this latest version of the imx-drm DT binding patches applies > on top of staging-next and also depends on the OF graph binding > patchset that moves the v4l2_of helpers to drivers/of. > Currently, the two patchsets are also

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-03-07 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 05:56:12PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:20:51AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this latest version of the imx-drm DT binding patches applies > > on top of staging-next and also depends on the OF graph binding > > patchset

[PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings

2014-03-05 Thread Philipp Zabel
Hi, this latest version of the imx-drm DT binding patches applies on top of staging-next and also depends on the OF graph binding patchset that moves the v4l2_of helpers to drivers/of. Currently, the two patchsets are also available at: git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git topic/of-graph