Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/5] Use drm_clflush* instead of clflush

2022-02-08 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 07/02/2022 12:44, Jani Nikula wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2022, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 04/02/2022 16:37, Michael Cheng wrote: This patch series re-work a few i915 functions to use drm_clflush_virt_range instead of calling clflush or clflushopt directly. This will prevent errors when building

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/5] Use drm_clflush* instead of clflush

2022-02-07 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 07 Feb 2022, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > On 04/02/2022 16:37, Michael Cheng wrote: >> This patch series re-work a few i915 functions to use drm_clflush_virt_range >> instead of calling clflush or clflushopt directly. This will prevent errors >> when building for non-x86 architectures. >> >> v

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Use drm_clflush* instead of clflush

2022-02-07 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 04/02/2022 16:37, Michael Cheng wrote: This patch series re-work a few i915 functions to use drm_clflush_virt_range instead of calling clflush or clflushopt directly. This will prevent errors when building for non-x86 architectures. v2: s/PAGE_SIZE/sizeof(value) for Re-work intel_write_stat

[PATCH v5 0/5] Use drm_clflush* instead of clflush

2022-02-04 Thread Michael Cheng
This patch series re-work a few i915 functions to use drm_clflush_virt_range instead of calling clflush or clflushopt directly. This will prevent errors when building for non-x86 architectures. v2: s/PAGE_SIZE/sizeof(value) for Re-work intel_write_status_page and added more patches to convert addi