On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>
> The outcome of the previous RFC about how do secure data path was the need
> of a secure memory allocator (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/5/551)
>
Have you addressed all the questions raised by Alan here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/8/629
Also,
2015-10-21 16:34 GMT+02:00 James Morris :
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>
>>
>> The outcome of the previous RFC about how do secure data path was the need
>> of a secure memory allocator (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/5/551)
>>
>
> Have you addressed all the questions raised by Ala
version 5 changes:
- rebased on kernel 4.3-rc6
- rework locking schema and make handle status use an atomic_t
- add a fake secure module to allow performing tests without trusted
environment
version 4 changes:
- rebased on kernel 4.3-rc3
- fix missing EXPORT_SYMBOL for smaf_create_handle()