Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] drm/i915: IRQ fixes

2021-07-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Jul 03, 2021 at 07:55:31PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 02.07.21 um 21:51 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 07:36:16PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > > Fix a bug in the usage of IRQs and cleanup references to the DRM > > > IRQ midlayer. > > > > > > Pre

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] drm/i915: IRQ fixes

2021-07-03 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 02.07.21 um 21:51 schrieb Daniel Vetter: On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 07:36:16PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: Fix a bug in the usage of IRQs and cleanup references to the DRM IRQ midlayer. Preferably this patchset would be merged through drm-misc-next. v5: * go back to _hardirq()

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] drm/i915: IRQ fixes

2021-07-02 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 07:36:16PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Fix a bug in the usage of IRQs and cleanup references to the DRM > IRQ midlayer. > > Preferably this patchset would be merged through drm-misc-next. > > v5: > * go back to _hardirq() after CI tests reported atomic >

[PATCH v5 0/2] drm/i915: IRQ fixes

2021-07-01 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Fix a bug in the usage of IRQs and cleanup references to the DRM IRQ midlayer. Preferably this patchset would be merged through drm-misc-next. v5: * go back to _hardirq() after CI tests reported atomic context in PCI probe; add rsp comment v4: * switch IRQ code to intel_