On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 4:09 AM Saravana Kannan wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:44 AM Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> > +Saravana
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:27 PM Nicolas Boichat
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > When there is a single power domain per device, the core will
> > > ensure the power do
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 2:09 PM Saravana Kannan wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:44 AM Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> > +Saravana
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:27 PM Nicolas Boichat
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > When there is a single power domain per device, the core will
> > > ensure the power do
+Saravana
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:27 PM Nicolas Boichat wrote:
>
> When there is a single power domain per device, the core will
> ensure the power domain is switched on (so it is technically
> equivalent to having not power domain specified at all).
>
> However, when there are multiple domains
On 07/02/2020 05:26, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> When there is a single power domain per device, the core will
> ensure the power domain is switched on (so it is technically
> equivalent to having not power domain specified at all).
>
> However, when there are multiple domains, as in MT8183 Bifrost
>
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 06:27, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
>
> When there is a single power domain per device, the core will
> ensure the power domain is switched on (so it is technically
> equivalent to having not power domain specified at all).
>
> However, when there are multiple domains, as in MT8183
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 13:50, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:26 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 06:27, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > >
> > > When there is a single power domain per device, the core will
> > > ensure the power domain is switched on (so it is
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pfdev->pm_domain_devs); i++) {
> + if (!pfdev->pm_domain_devs[i])
> + break;
I'm not totally familiar with this code, but should this be a break or
just a continue?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:26 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 06:27, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> >
> > When there is a single power domain per device, the core will
> > ensure the power domain is switched on (so it is technically
> > equivalent to having not power domain specified at
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 9:52 PM Alyssa Rosenzweig
wrote:
>
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pfdev->pm_domain_devs); i++) {
> > + if (!pfdev->pm_domain_devs[i])
> > + break;
(next time, please provide a tiny bit more context when quoting, I had
to look up to see
When there is a single power domain per device, the core will
ensure the power domain is switched on (so it is technically
equivalent to having not power domain specified at all).
However, when there are multiple domains, as in MT8183 Bifrost
GPU, we need to handle them in driver code.
Signed-off
10 matches
Mail list logo
