On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:49 AM Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 09:24 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> > So, I guess this is to do w/ the magic of merge commits, but it looks
> > like the hunk changing the crtc_ww_class got lost:
>
> So what happened here is that this commit ch
Hi,
On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 09:24 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> So, I guess this is to do w/ the magic of merge commits, but it looks
> like the hunk changing the crtc_ww_class got lost:
So what happened here is that this commit changed it to
DEFINE_WD_CLASS
and the following commit changed it back ag
So, I guess this is to do w/ the magic of merge commits, but it looks
like the hunk changing the crtc_ww_class got lost:
~/src/linux master git show --pretty=short
08295b3b5beec9aac0f7a9db86f0fc3792039da3
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c
commit 08295b3b5beec9aac0f7a9db86f0fc3792039da3
Au
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:24:44AM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> The current Wound-Wait mutex algorithm is actually not Wound-Wait but
> Wait-Die. Implement also Wound-Wait as a per-ww-class choice. Wound-Wait
> is, contrary to Wait-Die a preemptive algorithm and is known to generate
> fewer bac
The current Wound-Wait mutex algorithm is actually not Wound-Wait but
Wait-Die. Implement also Wound-Wait as a per-ww-class choice. Wound-Wait
is, contrary to Wait-Die a preemptive algorithm and is known to generate
fewer backoffs. Testing reveals that this is true if the
number of simultaneous con
