On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 1:52 PM Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>
> On 26.04.2018 10:07, Jyri Sarha wrote:
> > Add device_link from panel device (supplier) to drm device (consumer)
> > when drm_panel_attach() is called. This patch should protect the
> > master drm driver if an attached panel driver unbinds w
On 31.08.2018 10:56, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 4:41 PM Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> [Me]
>>> This happens because the connector struct device is the
>>> same as the bridge struct device, I suppose.
>> I guess it is rather because the code tries to make circular dependency:
>> 1. pa
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 4:41 PM Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> [Me]
> > This happens because the connector struct device is the
> > same as the bridge struct device, I suppose.
>
> I guess it is rather because the code tries to make circular dependency:
> 1. panel depends on dsi-host because it is MIPI-DS
On 30.08.2018 14:32, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:07 AM Jyri Sarha wrote:
>
>> Add device_link from panel device (supplier) to drm device (consumer)
>> when drm_panel_attach() is called. This patch should protect the
>> master drm driver if an attached panel driver unbinds whi
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:07 AM Jyri Sarha wrote:
> Add device_link from panel device (supplier) to drm device (consumer)
> when drm_panel_attach() is called. This patch should protect the
> master drm driver if an attached panel driver unbinds while it is in
> use. The device_link should make s
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Jyri Sarha wrote:
> Add device_link from panel device (supplier) to drm device (consumer)
> when drm_panel_attach() is called. This patch should protect the
> master drm driver if an attached panel driver unbinds while it is in
> use. The device_link should make s
On 2018-05-23 14:38, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 12:46, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2018-05-23 11:39, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>
>> *snip*
>>
>>> Panels are managed by dsi host only if dsi host implements it, and it is
>>> up to dsi host author, it is not mandatory. The only case I am aware of
>
On 2018-05-22 17:03, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-22 11:45, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 22.05.2018 09:36, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> On 2018-05-22 08:29, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 21.05.2018 23:56, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-21 11:21, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 21.05.2018 10:53, Peter
On 2018-05-23 11:39, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
*snip*
> Panels are managed by dsi host only if dsi host implements it, and it is
> up to dsi host author, it is not mandatory. The only case I am aware of
> is exynos-dsi. I guess most developers are not aware of the problem, or
> they do not care, or ..
On 23.05.2018 12:46, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-23 11:39, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>
> *snip*
>
>> Panels are managed by dsi host only if dsi host implements it, and it is
>> up to dsi host author, it is not mandatory. The only case I am aware of
>> is exynos-dsi. I guess most developers are not a
On 23.05.2018 10:29, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-22 17:03, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2018-05-22 11:45, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>> On 22.05.2018 09:36, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2018-05-22 08:29, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 21.05.2018 23:56, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2018-05-21 11:21, Andrzej
On 2018-05-22 08:29, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 21.05.2018 23:56, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2018-05-21 11:21, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>> On 21.05.2018 10:53, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2018-05-21 10:15, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 19.05.2018 18:48, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2018-05-18 13:51, Andrz
On 2018-05-22 11:45, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 22.05.2018 09:36, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2018-05-22 08:29, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>> On 21.05.2018 23:56, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2018-05-21 11:21, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 21.05.2018 10:53, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2018-05-21 10:15, Andrz
On 2018-05-22 09:36, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-22 08:29, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 21.05.2018 23:56, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> On 2018-05-21 11:21, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 21.05.2018 10:53, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-21 10:15, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 19.05.2018 18:48, Peter
On 22.05.2018 09:36, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-22 08:29, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 21.05.2018 23:56, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> On 2018-05-21 11:21, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 21.05.2018 10:53, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-21 10:15, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 19.05.2018 18:48, Peter
On 2018-05-21 11:21, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 21.05.2018 10:53, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2018-05-21 10:15, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>> On 19.05.2018 18:48, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2018-05-18 13:51, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 26.04.2018 10:07, Jyri Sarha wrote:
>> Add device_link from panel
On 21.05.2018 23:56, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-21 11:21, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 21.05.2018 10:53, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> On 2018-05-21 10:15, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 19.05.2018 18:48, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-18 13:51, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 26.04.2018 10:07, Jyri
On 2018-05-21 10:15, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 19.05.2018 18:48, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2018-05-18 13:51, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>> On 26.04.2018 10:07, Jyri Sarha wrote:
Add device_link from panel device (supplier) to drm device (consumer)
when drm_panel_attach() is called. This patch s
On 21.05.2018 10:53, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-21 10:15, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 19.05.2018 18:48, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> On 2018-05-18 13:51, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 26.04.2018 10:07, Jyri Sarha wrote:
> Add device_link from panel device (supplier) to drm device (consumer)
>
On 2018-05-18 13:51, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 26.04.2018 10:07, Jyri Sarha wrote:
>> Add device_link from panel device (supplier) to drm device (consumer)
>> when drm_panel_attach() is called. This patch should protect the
>> master drm driver if an attached panel driver unbinds while it is in
>>
On 2018-05-19 18:48, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-18 13:51, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 26.04.2018 10:07, Jyri Sarha wrote:
>>> Add device_link from panel device (supplier) to drm device (consumer)
>>> when drm_panel_attach() is called. This patch should protect the
>>> master drm driver if an at
On 19.05.2018 18:48, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-18 13:51, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 26.04.2018 10:07, Jyri Sarha wrote:
>>> Add device_link from panel device (supplier) to drm device (consumer)
>>> when drm_panel_attach() is called. This patch should protect the
>>> master drm driver if an at
On 18/05/18 14:51, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 26.04.2018 10:07, Jyri Sarha wrote:
>> Add device_link from panel device (supplier) to drm device (consumer)
>> when drm_panel_attach() is called. This patch should protect the
>> master drm driver if an attached panel driver unbinds while it is in
>> us
On 26.04.2018 10:07, Jyri Sarha wrote:
> Add device_link from panel device (supplier) to drm device (consumer)
> when drm_panel_attach() is called. This patch should protect the
> master drm driver if an attached panel driver unbinds while it is in
> use. The device_link should make sure the drm de
Add device_link from panel device (supplier) to drm device (consumer)
when drm_panel_attach() is called. This patch should protect the
master drm driver if an attached panel driver unbinds while it is in
use. The device_link should make sure the drm device is unbound before
the panel driver becomes
25 matches
Mail list logo