On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:05:42PM +0100, Alessandro Carminati wrote:
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE
> > > +# define HAVE_BUG_FUNCTION
> > > +# define __BUG_FUNC_PTR " .long %0-.\n"
> > > +# define __BUG_FUNC __func__
> >
> > gcc 7.5.0 on s390 barfs; it doesn't like the
Hello Guenter,
Sorry for being late to the party.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 6:06 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> On 3/13/25 04:43, Alessandro Carminati wrote:
> > From: Guenter Roeck
> >
> > Add name of functions triggering warning backtraces to the __bug_table
> > object section to enable support for
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025, at 18:05, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 3/13/25 04:43, Alessandro Carminati wrote:
>
> gcc 10.3.0 and later do not have this problem. I also tried s390 builds
> with gcc 9.4
> and 9.5 but they both crash for unrelated reasons.
>
> If this is a concern, the best idea I have is to
On 3/13/25 04:43, Alessandro Carminati wrote:
From: Guenter Roeck
Add name of functions triggering warning backtraces to the __bug_table
object section to enable support for suppressing WARNING backtraces.
To limit image size impact, the pointer to the function name is only added
to the __bug_
From: Guenter Roeck
Add name of functions triggering warning backtraces to the __bug_table
object section to enable support for suppressing WARNING backtraces.
To limit image size impact, the pointer to the function name is only added
to the __bug_table section if both CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACK
