Hi Rob,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 06:44:53PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:46:18 +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> > DP_INTF is a similar functional block to mediatek,dpi but is different
> > in that it serves the DisplayPort controller on mediatek SoCs and uses
> > diff
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:46:18 +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> DP_INTF is a similar functional block to mediatek,dpi but is different
> in that it serves the DisplayPort controller on mediatek SoCs and uses
> different clocks. Therefore this patch creates a new binding file for
> this funct
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:43 AM Markus Schneider-Pargmann
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 08:36:18AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:46:18 +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> > > DP_INTF is a similar functional block to mediatek,dpi but is different
> > > in t
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 08:36:18AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:46:18 +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> > DP_INTF is a similar functional block to mediatek,dpi but is different
> > in that it serves the DisplayPort controller on mediatek SoCs and uses
> > differen
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:46:18 +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> DP_INTF is a similar functional block to mediatek,dpi but is different
> in that it serves the DisplayPort controller on mediatek SoCs and uses
> different clocks. Therefore this patch creates a new binding file for
> this funct
DP_INTF is a similar functional block to mediatek,dpi but is different
in that it serves the DisplayPort controller on mediatek SoCs and uses
different clocks. Therefore this patch creates a new binding file for
this functional block.
Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann
---
Notes:
Chang
