Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] drm: zpos normalization cleanup and omapdrm to use it

2018-03-28 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 28/03/18 15:10, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> Thanks. I think this looks fine, I'll push via drm-misc. > > There is v5 on the list. Yep, that's what I pushed. Somehow I managed to reply to this older thread... Tomi -- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Bus

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] drm: zpos normalization cleanup and omapdrm to use it

2018-03-28 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
On 2018-03-28 12:30, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/02/18 14:05, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Changes since v3: >> - Moved the new normalize_zpos bool to be around another bools >> - Extended the commit message for sti that the drm_atomic_helper_check() is >> going to ask for asyn

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] drm: zpos normalization cleanup and omapdrm to use it

2018-03-28 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
Hi, On 06/02/18 14:05, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hi, > > Changes since v3: > - Moved the new normalize_zpos bool to be around another bools > - Extended the commit message for sti that the drm_atomic_helper_check() is > going to ask for async_update due to the legacy cursor usage. > > Changes si

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] drm: zpos normalization cleanup and omapdrm to use it

2018-03-07 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
Hi, On 2018-02-06 14:05, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hi, > > Changes since v3: > - Moved the new normalize_zpos bool to be around another bools > - Extended the commit message for sti that the drm_atomic_helper_check() is > going to ask for async_update due to the legacy cursor usage. I think I ha

[PATCH v4 0/6] drm: zpos normalization cleanup and omapdrm to use it

2018-02-06 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
Hi, Changes since v3: - Moved the new normalize_zpos bool to be around another bools - Extended the commit message for sti that the drm_atomic_helper_check() is going to ask for async_update due to the legacy cursor usage. Changes since v2: - Fixed commit messages (s/drm_device/drm_mode_config)