On 08/12/2012 04:31 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> So I vote for getting this into stable and hopefully the maintainers
> agree.
Paul -
We obviously disagree on whether this makes sense for -stable. If you
feel strongly that it should go in, I suggest that you go ahead and
submit it for inclusion.
Th
On 08/12/2012 04:31 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> So I vote for getting this into stable and hopefully the maintainers
> agree.
Paul -
We obviously disagree on whether this makes sense for -stable. If you
feel strongly that it should go in, I suggest that you go ahead and
submit it for inclusion.
Th
Dear Ian,
thank you very much for your quick iterations. Hopefully the developers
will review this on Monday.
Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2012, 15:07 -0500 schrieb Ian Pilcher:
> Another rev. I figured out how to use git reset --hard and --soft to
> make regenerating the patch series a bit easier. (
On 12.08.2012 22:07, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> Another rev. I figured out how to use git reset --hard and --soft to
> make regenerating the patch series a bit easier. (It helped a ton
> that all of the later changes are isolated in a single file.) I still
> feel like I'm probably missing an easier wa
Another rev. I figured out how to use git reset --hard and --soft to
make regenerating the patch series a bit easier. (It helped a ton
that all of the later changes are isolated in a single file.) I still
feel like I'm probably missing an easier way to go back a fix a simple
type, however.
* Fi
Dear Ian,
thank you very much for your quick iterations. Hopefully the developers
will review this on Monday.
Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2012, 15:07 -0500 schrieb Ian Pilcher:
> Another rev. I figured out how to use git reset --hard and --soft to
> make regenerating the patch series a bit easier. (
On 12.08.2012 22:07, Ian Pilcher wrote:
Another rev. I figured out how to use git reset --hard and --soft to
make regenerating the patch series a bit easier. (It helped a ton
that all of the later changes are isolated in a single file.) I still
feel like I'm probably missing an easier way to g
Another rev. I figured out how to use git reset --hard and --soft to
make regenerating the patch series a bit easier. (It helped a ton
that all of the later changes are isolated in a single file.) I still
feel like I'm probably missing an easier way to go back a fix a simple
type, however.
* Fi