On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 08:16, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2025 16:03:37 +0100
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Unfortunately I have to revoke my T-b as we're seeing a pile of
> > failures in a CI stress test with this, e.g.
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/daniels/mesa/-/jobs/77004047
>
>
On Sat, 24 May 2025 16:03:37 +0100
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Ashley,
>
> On Fri, 23 May 2025 at 16:10, Ashley Smith wrote:
> > The timeout logic provided by drm_sched leads to races when we try
> > to suspend it while the drm_sched workqueue queues more jobs. Let's
> > overhaul the timeout handl
Hi Ashley,
On Fri, 23 May 2025 at 16:10, Ashley Smith wrote:
> The timeout logic provided by drm_sched leads to races when we try
> to suspend it while the drm_sched workqueue queues more jobs. Let's
> overhaul the timeout handling in panthor to have our own delayed work
> that's resumed/suspende
The timeout logic provided by drm_sched leads to races when we try
to suspend it while the drm_sched workqueue queues more jobs. Let's
overhaul the timeout handling in panthor to have our own delayed work
that's resumed/suspended when a group is resumed/suspended. When an
actual timeout occurs, we
