On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:30:28PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> The same function had already been merged with a different name. Remove
> the duplicate one but reuse some of its kerneldoc fragments for the
> existing implementation.
And I just used that function. Oh well ;)
Personally I would h
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:57:56PM +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:30:28PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > The same function had already been merged with a different name. Remove
> > the duplicate one but reuse some of its kerneldoc fragments for the
> > existing implement
The same function had already been merged with a different name. Remove
the duplicate one but reuse some of its kerneldoc fragments for the
existing implementation.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 30 +++---
include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 3 +
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:57:56PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:30:28PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > The same function had already been merged with a different name. Remove
> > the duplicate one but reuse some of its kerneldoc fragments for the
> > existing implement
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:30:28PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> The same function had already been merged with a different name. Remove
> the duplicate one but reuse some of its kerneldoc fragments for the
> existing implementation.
And I just used that function. Oh well ;)
Personally I would h
The same function had already been merged with a different name. Remove
the duplicate one but reuse some of its kerneldoc fragments for the
existing implementation.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 30 +++---
include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 3 +