(Adding Maxime)
Den 06.02.2017 13.34, skrev Andrzej Hajda:
On 06.02.2017 12:53, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 01:30:09PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 05:03:15PM +0100, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
Add support for MIPI
On 06.02.2017 12:53, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 01:30:09PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 05:03:15PM +0100, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
Add support for MIPI DBI compatible controllers.
Interface type C op
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 01:30:09PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 05:03:15PM +0100, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> >> Add support for MIPI DBI compatible controllers.
> >> Interface type C option 1 and 3 are supported (SPI).
> >>
> >> S
On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 05:03:15PM +0100, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
>> Add support for MIPI DBI compatible controllers.
>> Interface type C option 1 and 3 are supported (SPI).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes
>> ---
>> Documentation/gpu/tinydrm.rst
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> +static bool mipi_dbi_command_is_read(struct mipi_dbi *mipi, u8 cmd)
Okay this is one giant bikeshedding nitpick, but here goes anyway. Why
do you call MIPI DBI just "mipi", here and all around? Why not
"mipi_dbi" or "dbi"? We never talk about "vesa" d
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 05:03:15PM +0100, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> Add support for MIPI DBI compatible controllers.
> Interface type C option 1 and 3 are supported (SPI).
>
> Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes
> ---
> Documentation/gpu/tinydrm.rst | 12 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/Kconfig|
Add support for MIPI DBI compatible controllers.
Interface type C option 1 and 3 are supported (SPI).
Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes
---
Documentation/gpu/tinydrm.rst | 12 +
drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/Kconfig|3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/Makefile |3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/m
