On 07/22/2013 12:55 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot to CC correctly.
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:53 PM, David Herrmann
> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
>> wrote:
>>> On 07/18/2013 10:54 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jul
Sorry, I forgot to CC correctly.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:53 PM, David Herrmann
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> On 07/18/2013 10:54 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
>>> wrote:
>>
>>
>
On 07/22/2013 12:55 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to CC correctly.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:53 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
On 07/18/2013 10:54 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Thomas Hell
Sorry, I forgot to CC correctly.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:53 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> On 07/18/2013 10:54 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
>>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
On 07/18/2013 10:54 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
...
>>
>> I think that if there are good reasons to keep locking internal, I'm fine
>> with that, (And also, of course, with
>> Daniel's proposal). Currently the add / remove / look
Op 18-07-13 22:54, David Herrmann schreef:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> On 07/18/2013 01:07 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
>>> wrote:
A quick look, but not a full review:
Looks m
On 07/18/2013 10:54 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
...
I think that if there are good reasons to keep locking internal, I'm fine
with that, (And also, of course, with
Daniel's proposal). Currently the add / remove / lookup paths are mo
Op 18-07-13 22:54, David Herrmann schreef:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> On 07/18/2013 01:07 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
>>> wrote:
A quick look, but not a full review:
Looks m
Hi
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 01:07 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> A quick look, but not a full review:
>>>
>>> Looks mostly good, but it looks like the TTM vm lock isn't
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:54 PM, David Herrmann
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> On 07/18/2013 01:07 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
>>> wrote:
A quick look, but not a full re
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:54 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> On 07/18/2013 01:07 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
>>> wrote:
A quick look, but not a full rev
Hi
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 01:07 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> A quick look, but not a full review:
>>>
>>> Looks mostly good, but it looks like the TTM vm lock isn't
On 07/18/2013 01:07 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> A quick look, but not a full review:
>>
>> Looks mostly good, but it looks like the TTM vm lock isn't needed at all
>> anymore (provided the vma offset manager is properly protecte
Hi
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> A quick look, but not a full review:
>
> Looks mostly good, but it looks like the TTM vm lock isn't needed at all
> anymore (provided the vma offset manager is properly protected), since
> kref_get_unless_zero() is used when a referen
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> A quick look, but not a full review:
>
> Looks mostly good, but it looks like the TTM vm lock isn't needed at all
> anymore (provided the vma offset manager is properly protected), since
> kref_get_unless_zero() is used when a reference a
A quick look, but not a full review:
Looks mostly good, but it looks like the TTM vm lock isn't needed at all
anymore (provided the vma offset manager is properly protected), since
kref_get_unless_zero() is used when a reference after lookup is taken.
(please see the kref_get_unless_zero documen
On 07/18/2013 01:07 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
A quick look, but not a full review:
Looks mostly good, but it looks like the TTM vm lock isn't needed at all
anymore (provided the vma offset manager is properly protected), since
kref_
Hi
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> A quick look, but not a full review:
>
> Looks mostly good, but it looks like the TTM vm lock isn't needed at all
> anymore (provided the vma offset manager is properly protected), since
> kref_get_unless_zero() is used when a referen
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> A quick look, but not a full review:
>
> Looks mostly good, but it looks like the TTM vm lock isn't needed at all
> anymore (provided the vma offset manager is properly protected), since
> kref_get_unless_zero() is used when a reference a
A quick look, but not a full review:
Looks mostly good, but it looks like the TTM vm lock isn't needed at all
anymore (provided the vma offset manager is properly protected), since
kref_get_unless_zero() is used when a reference after lookup is taken.
(please see the kref_get_unless_zero docume
Use the new vma-manager infrastructure. This doesn't change any
implementation details as the vma-offset-manager is nearly copied 1-to-1
from TTM.
Even though the vma-manager uses its own locks, we still need bo->vm_lock
to prevent bos from being destroyed before we can get a reference during
look
Use the new vma-manager infrastructure. This doesn't change any
implementation details as the vma-offset-manager is nearly copied 1-to-1
from TTM.
Even though the vma-manager uses its own locks, we still need bo->vm_lock
to prevent bos from being destroyed before we can get a reference during
look
22 matches
Mail list logo