Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

2024-01-29 Thread Conor Dooley
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:41:22AM +, dharm...@microchip.com wrote: > I will proceed with updating the clock names to include "lvds pll" and > adjusting the clocks minitems to 3. Does this seem appropriate to you? > > Please let me know if there are any additional considerations or > specifi

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

2024-01-28 Thread Dharma.B
Hi Conor, On 26/01/24 9:03 pm, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 02:22:42PM +,dharm...@microchip.com wrote: >> On 25/01/24 1:57 pm, Conor Dooley - M52691 wrote: > If the lvds pll is an input to the hlcdc, you need to add it here. >From your description earlier it does

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

2024-01-26 Thread Conor Dooley
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 02:22:42PM +, dharm...@microchip.com wrote: > On 25/01/24 1:57 pm, Conor Dooley - M52691 wrote: > > > >>> If the lvds pll is an input to the hlcdc, you need to add it here. > >>> From your description earlier it does sound like it is an input to > >>> the hlcdc, but n

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

2024-01-26 Thread Dharma.B
Hi Conor, On 25/01/24 1:57 pm, Conor Dooley - M52691 wrote: > >>> If the lvds pll is an input to the hlcdc, you need to add it here. >>> From your description earlier it does sound like it is an input to >>> the hlcdc, but now you are claiming that it is not. >> >> The LVDS PLL serves as an inp

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

2024-01-25 Thread Conor Dooley
> > If the lvds pll is an input to the hlcdc, you need to add it here. > > From your description earlier it does sound like it is an input to > > the hlcdc, but now you are claiming that it is not. > > The LVDS PLL serves as an input to both the LCDC and LVDSC Then it should be an input to both

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

2024-01-24 Thread Dharma.B
Hi Conor, On 24/01/24 10:09 pm, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 05:18:26AM +,dharm...@microchip.com wrote: >> Hi Conor & All, >> >> On 22/01/24 2:46 pm, Conor Dooley wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 03:38:41AM +,dharm...@microchip.com wrote: Hi Conor, On 19/01/2

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

2024-01-24 Thread Conor Dooley
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 05:18:26AM +, dharm...@microchip.com wrote: > Hi Conor & All, > > On 22/01/24 2:46 pm, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 03:38:41AM +,dharm...@microchip.com wrote: > >> Hi Conor, > >> On 19/01/24 5:33 pm, Conor Dooley - M52691 wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jan

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

2024-01-23 Thread Dharma.B
Hi Conor & All, On 22/01/24 2:46 pm, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 03:38:41AM +,dharm...@microchip.com wrote: >> Hi Conor, >> On 19/01/24 5:33 pm, Conor Dooley - M52691 wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 03:32:49AM +,dharm...@microchip.com wrote: On 18/01/24 9:10 pm,

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

2024-01-22 Thread Conor Dooley
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 03:38:41AM +, dharm...@microchip.com wrote: > Hi Conor, > On 19/01/24 5:33 pm, Conor Dooley - M52691 wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 03:32:49AM +, dharm...@microchip.com wrote: > >> On 18/01/24 9:10 pm, Conor Dooley wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:56:12PM

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

2024-01-21 Thread Dharma.B
Hi Conor, On 19/01/24 5:33 pm, Conor Dooley - M52691 wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 03:32:49AM +, dharm...@microchip.com wrote: >> On 18/01/24 9:10 pm, Conor Dooley wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:56:12PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote: Convert the atmel,hlcdc binding to DT sch

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

2024-01-19 Thread Conor Dooley
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 03:32:49AM +, dharm...@microchip.com wrote: > On 18/01/24 9:10 pm, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:56:12PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote: > >> Convert the atmel,hlcdc binding to DT schema format. > >> > >> Adjust the clock-names property to clarif

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

2024-01-18 Thread Dharma.B
On 18/01/24 9:10 pm, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:56:12PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote: >> Convert the atmel,hlcdc binding to DT schema format. >> >> Adjust the clock-names property to clarify that the LCD controller expects >> one of these clocks (either sys_clk or lvds_p

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

2024-01-18 Thread Conor Dooley
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:56:12PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote: > Convert the atmel,hlcdc binding to DT schema format. > > Adjust the clock-names property to clarify that the LCD controller expects > one of these clocks (either sys_clk or lvds_pll_clk to be present but not > both) along wit

[PATCH v3 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel, hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

2024-01-18 Thread Dharma Balasubiramani
Convert the atmel,hlcdc binding to DT schema format. Adjust the clock-names property to clarify that the LCD controller expects one of these clocks (either sys_clk or lvds_pll_clk to be present but not both) along with the slow_clk and periph_clk. This alignment with the actual hardware requiremen